Having already covered the dress rehearsal and the press preview of the Basilique Performing Arts Company’s adaptation of John Milton’s famous epic poem “Paradise Lost“, I am now in a position to review it in as much depth as I can, given my own limited knowledge and understanding of the Arts and of the historical, political and religious context that influenced Milton to write his epic. Before I proceed any further, though, I could offer a single-sentence summary of the performance: You cannot afford to miss it.
In my previous posts, I described it as the most ambitious and perhaps the most important artistic event in Second Life and virtual worlds for 2014. Having watched the dress rehearsal, the press preview and the official premiere, my assessment still stands and I believe it to be strengthened even further.
Such is the extent to which Paradise Lost, John Milton’s epic poem (first published in 1667), has become ingrained not only in English culture, but also in the English language itself. It has become a phrase that practically everyone who can speak and read English has encountered at one point or another, even if they are unaware of its origins. For its time, it expressed forward-looking, novel ideas and concepts that led many of Milton’s contemporaries to label him a radical: The ideas he expressed w.r.t. marriage, for instance, as shown in his depiction of Adam and Eve’s relationship; or his extremely strict views on idolatry, which led him to also reject the idea of Dei Gratia monarchy.
John Milton’s Satan
But the impact of Paradise Lost on English, American and Western culture goes much further than that; Milton’s depiction of the poem’s characters has also influenced English, American and Western storytelling: Satan, the first major character that the poem introduces to the reader, was the most beautiful of all Heaven’s angels and is portrayed as a tragic figure who describes himself with the famous line “Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven.” His failed rebellion against God for control of Heaven, stemming from his unwillingness to be a subordinate to God and his Son, claiming that angels are “self-begot, self-raised” and thus God is not entitled to rule over them as their creator. Milton portrays Satan as a very arrogant, but also powerful and charismatic character, with a formidable ability to persuade others to do his bidding. Besides his (true to the religious description) cunning and deceptive character, he is able to persuade the angels that followed him to continue their rebellion against God, despite their defeat in the Angelic War. According to Satan, God is a tyrannic ruler and angels ought to rule as gods.
There are parallels that can be drawn between Milton’s Satan and the tragic heroes of ancient Greek drama, but Satan’s hubris makes the behaviours of Greek tragic heroes that trigger the dramatic events pale in comparison. On some occasions in the poem, he seems to play the narrative role of the anti-hero, but it is always clear, at least to me, that he is really the narration’s antagonist. Regardless of this, though, his role has been discussed quite vigorously. For instance, C.S. Lewis sees Paradise Lost as a genuine Christian morality tale, while William Empson and other critics see an ambiguity in Milton’s complex characterisation of Satan.
The way later works portray their antagonists has been heavily influenced by Milton’s “heroic evil” – as Laskya Claren describes him – Satan. He has certain elements seen in the “anti-hero” characters of modern works, and, beyond that, he has all the twisted, catastrophic and fatal charm of a sociopath. I would dare say that the portrayal of Morgoth (initially Melkor) from John Ronald Reuel Tolkien’s Silmarillion is practically lifted from Paradise Lost. He deceives Men and Elves alike to do his bidding against the will of Eru Ilúvatar, the demiurge of Tolkien’s universe, against whom Melkor/Morgoth rebelled in Ainulindalë, by successfully disguising and presenting himself as a charming, charismatic bringer of gifts and arcane knowledge. Another author whose work has been influenced by Paradise Lost is Salman Rushdie, whose controversial novel The Satanic Verses adapted important motifs and plot elements from Milton’s poem, including a “fall”, followed by a transformation.
Adam and Eve as seen by John Milton
Milton departs from the biblical account of Adam and Eve’s relationship, temptation and fall; their tale is a domestic one and differs dramatically (for its time) from the “dictated by God” views of womanhood that are seen in all three Abrahamic religions. According to the biblical narration, Adam was innocent and goaded into sinning against God by Eve, who had been deceived by Satan. Ever since then, all three Abrahamic religions viewed women as inherently wicked, foolish and inferior to men in every way – thus, they must be kept under the rule of the Man, to whom they must belong as property. Of course, Judaism was hardly original in this, as the Torah’s unknown authors were merely reflecting and sanctifying the predominant views of patriarchal societies. And, of course, sexuality itself is condemned as evil.
In Paradise Lost, on the other hand, Adam and Eve are seen to be having a complete relationship while still being without sin. They are also portrayed as having their own personalities and passions. Adam and Eve are God’s prized creations and, unlike what we see in the Bible, their relationship is one of mutual dependence rather than one of domination or hierarchy. Furthermore, while Adam is shown to be more gregarious than Eve and possessing higher intellectual knowledge than her, she longs for knowledge, is intelligent herself and thirsts for knowledge – and, more specifically, self-knowledge. Also, while deeply in love with Adam, she sometimes seems to feel suffocated by his constant presence. So, one day she convinces Adam that they should split up and work in different parts of the Garden, which is when Satan, determined to exact revenge upon God by corrupting his prized creation, tempts her.
Please use the numbers below to navigate between the article’s pages
5 thoughts on “Paradise Lost in Second Life: Pushing the artistic and technical envelope”
Thank you very much for this detailed and insightful review. You’ve clearly spent the required time to dig beyond mere commentary, and have dug into the poem itself, the cultural and historical context in which it was first published, the background and disposition of the poet that dictated it, and the impact and response that this work has had on both historical and contemporary views of Abrahamic mythology since it was published.
I can see you have also clearly identified many of the topics that have surfaced as salient as the conversations have evolved: God being green, Satan as a female, the implicit homosexual references between Eve and Satan, Adam’s motivations behind eating the apple, Adam and Eve’s sex scene, the Son of God’s sadness, and Archangel Michael’s characterisation, the audience’s involvement as angels and devils, the ageing of Adam and Eve, and their final walk into the light.
I have refrained from commenting on analysis to date, and this has been deliberate. I’d like the analysis to continue and I feel that commenting on it will move the conversation towards a conclusion, and I don’t want to do that. In some cases, I’ve found that some commentary has even lead me realise some of my motivations, post hoc. Closing the door on that opportunity would be counter-productive to that goal, so I’m going to stay closed-lipped, for now.
Again, thank you for this excellent and intelligent review.
Thank you very much for your comment Becky. 🙂 I greatly enjoyed the performance and was pleased to see it had a definite, distinctive outlook on things rather than attempt to slavishly copy the poem. Once again, congratulations on a great show.
Reblogged this on The Basilique and commented:
Mona Eberhardt’s in-depth review of the sources and poet behind the production of Paradise Lost in Second Life.
Comments are closed.